卞旭旭, 闫福根, 于通顺, 等, xxxx. 海上风电桩基“抛石+”复合防护方法试验研究[J]. 海岸工程, x(x): xx-xx. doi: 10.12362/j.issn.1002-3682.20231229001.
    引用本文: 卞旭旭, 闫福根, 于通顺, 等, xxxx. 海上风电桩基“抛石+”复合防护方法试验研究[J]. 海岸工程, x(x): xx-xx. doi: 10.12362/j.issn.1002-3682.20231229001.
    BIAN X X, YAN F G, YU T S, et al, xxxx. Experimental study on the composite protection method of ‘riprap+’ for offshore wind power pile foundations[J]. Coastal Engineering, x(x): xx-xx. doi: 10.12362/j.issn.1002-3682.20231229001
    Citation: BIAN X X, YAN F G, YU T S, et al, xxxx. Experimental study on the composite protection method of ‘riprap+’ for offshore wind power pile foundations[J]. Coastal Engineering, x(x): xx-xx. doi: 10.12362/j.issn.1002-3682.20231229001

    海上风电桩基“抛石+”复合防护方法试验研究

    Experimental Study on the Composite Protection Method of ‘Riprap+’ for Offshore Wind Power Pile Foundations

    • 摘要: 针对现有海上风电基础冲刷防护措施的失效机理及薄弱之处,利用扰流环的驻涡原理降低了水流对抛石层的沉陷破坏、利用套筒固定抛石层从而减弱了抛石层的边缘破坏、利用仿生水草垫阻碍下潜水流及侧向来流的功能有效减弱了抛石层的剪切破坏,由此分别提出了抛石+扰流环、抛石+套筒、抛石+仿生水草三种新型复合防护方法,并按照3类复合防护措施的布置方式提出10种具体的复合防护设计。进一步开展物理模型试验,评估不同复合防护方法的防护效果。试验结果表明,海流作用下3类复合防护的防护效果均较好且明显优于抛石单独防护,防护效率均在66%以上。当抛石铺设范围为3倍单桩直径、抛石厚度为2倍的中值粒径,扰流环内部直径设置为2倍单桩直径、距离抛石层0.5倍桩径时,扰流环能够更好地发挥作用,使得到达抛石层以及周围泥沙的水流分散并且流速减缓,此种复合防护方法的防护效率为82.2%,能够达到理想的防护效果。

       

      Abstract: In view of the failure mechanism and weakness of the existing protective measures for offshore wind power foundations, the standing vortex principle of the disturbance flow ring is used to reduce the subsidence failure of the riprap layer by water flow, the riprap layer is fixed with a sleeve to weaken its edge failure, and the shear failure of the riprap layer is effectively weakened by closely fitting the biomimetic water grass to the riprap layer. Three new composite protection methods of riprap + disturbance flow ring, riprap + sleeve, riprap + biomimetic water grass are proposed respectively, and ten specific composite protection designs are proposed according to the arrangement of three types of composite protection measures. Further physical model tests were carried out to evaluate the protective effects of different composite protection methods. The test results show that the protection effect of the three types of composite protection under the action of ocean current is better than that of riprap alone protection, and the protection efficiency is above 66%. When the riprap laying range is 3 times the diameter of single pile and the thickness is 2 times the median diameter of riprap; When the inner diameter of the disturbance flow ring is 2 times the pile diameter and the distance from the riprap layer is 0.5 times the pile diameter, the disturbance flow ring can play a better role, so that the water flow reaching the riprap layer and the surrounding sediment is dispersed and the velocity is slowed down. The protection efficiency of this composite protection method is 82.2%, and can achieve the ideal protection effect.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回